In 2019, a homeowner who purchased their home the previous year was fearing the value the appraisal district would put on her residence, and hired us prior to values being mailed out. When we received the notice of value, the home that was purchased for $2,200,000 6 months before was valued by the appraisal district for “only” $1,665,514. Undeterred, we protested on the grounds of an unequal appraisal, and pointed to several other new homeowners who were valued at an even lower rate than she was.
Result: We achieved a further $131,000 reduction at the ARB hearing which netted the owner an additional $3,400+ in property tax savings.
We were retained by a homeowner in 2019 a mere three days prior to his scheduled protest hearing in front of the ARB. His home had a notified value of $2,200,000, and he was looking to get a value closer to $2,000,000. We successfully settled the protest with the appraisal district, prior to the scheduled hearing for a value of $1,800,000. In 2020, the appraisal district left the notified value unchanged at $1,800,000.
Result: We felt there was enough evidence to support an even lower value, a protest was filed, and we achieved another $100,000 value reduction to $1,700,000 in 2020. This resulted in an additional $2,600+ savings in property taxes.
In 2020, we were retained by an owner of a rental property whose notified value increased to $509,822 from the $435,000 value in 2019. We achieved a modest reduction at the ARB to a value of $495,000. We further consulted with the homeowner about his options, and suggested he appeal the ARB decision via binding arbitration.
Result: Prior to arbitration, we offered to settle the protest for the 2019 value of $435,000. The appraisal district was willing to settle at $465,000. We went into the arbitration hearing with a compelling argument showing a severely unfair assessment and won at arbitration getting a value reduction to $360,236.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |